Stubborn stance of whatsapp Where the account will not be deleted if you do not accept the privacy policy

New Delhi. The social networking site WhatsApp has been adamant about the deadline of its new privacy policy. WhatsApp has said in clear words that it has not made any change in its deadline. The company has said that we are not giving any time to the users beyond May 15, 2021. Therefore, the user who has not accepted the privacy policy, will now start getting their account deleted. Advocate Kapil Sibbal, who is representing the company in Delhi High Court, says that the user who does not accept this policy, his account will be deleted. WhatsApp has been sending notifications since January 2021 Sibal said that we have requested the users to agree on the policy. If they do not agree, then we will delete their account. There is no proposal to postpone this policy. Controversy has arisen over the company’s new privacy policy. Sibal says that the company has not postponed the policy. Please tell that a notification of privacy policy was being issued by WhatsApp. In this, the deadline was given till 15 May 2021 to accept the policy. This policy was first issued in January 2021, whose deadline was extended till February. It was then postponed until May 2021.

read this also- Strict warning of WHO: If working more than 55 hours a week will increase the risk of death, increased cases of heart disease WhatsApp will share users’ data with Facebook According to WhatsApp’s new policy, the company will have the right to share some data related to the interaction of the users with the parent company Facebook. Regarding this, the company is sending a notification to the users to accept the new privacy policy. Only after accepting this, the WhatsApp account of the users will continue. Hearing is going on in the Delhi High Court on this matter. It has been postponed till 3 June 2021. The status quo was demanded by Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma and the petitioners. After this, the court decided to postpone the hearing of the case. However, the company opposed the stance on this policy during the hearing.